CDSS Survey Process and Handling Type A vs Type B Deficiencies
Understand the CDSS survey process for California RCFEs and how to properly handle Type A and Type B deficiencies under Title 22. Learn correction timelines, enforcement actions, and compliance strategies.
1/4/20264 min read
The CDSS survey process for RCFEs is a critical regulatory mechanism designed to ensure compliance with California Title 22 regulations and protect resident safety. Surveys conducted by the Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) evaluate facilities for adherence to operational, health, safety, staffing, medication, and resident rights standards.
One of the most serious compliance events an RCFE can face is receiving a Type A or Type B deficiency citation. Understanding the distinction between these categories and how to properly respond is essential for protecting licensure and minimizing regulatory risk.
This article explains the CDSS survey process and provides a structured approach to handling Type A vs Type B deficiencies.
Regulatory Authority
RCFEs are regulated under:
California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8
California Health and Safety Code §§1569 et seq.
CDSS Community Care Licensing Division enforcement policies
Licensing analysts have statutory authority to inspect, cite, and enforce corrective actions.
The CDSS Survey Process
Types of Surveys
CDSS may conduct several types of inspections:
1. Pre-Licensing Visit
Conducted before issuance of a new RCFE license to verify compliance readiness.
2. Annual or Required Inspection
Routine compliance survey reviewing:
Resident files
Medication management
Staff records
Training documentation
Physical plant safety
Emergency preparedness
3. Complaint Investigation
Triggered by:
Resident complaints
Family reports
Ombudsman referrals
Law enforcement reports
Anonymous tips
Complaint surveys often focus narrowly on specific allegations but may expand into broader compliance review.
4. Follow-Up Visit
Conducted to verify correction of previously cited deficiencies.
What Surveyors Evaluate
During a CDSS survey, licensing analysts typically review:
Admission agreements
Resident assessments and care plans
Medication storage and MAR documentation
Staff training records
Criminal background clearances
Hospice coordination
Disaster drill documentation
Food service and sanitation
Personal rights compliance
Surveyors conduct interviews with residents and staff, observe operations, and review documentation.
Understanding Deficiencies
When non-compliance is identified, CDSS issues a deficiency citation. Deficiencies fall into two primary categories:
Type A Deficiencies
Type B Deficiencies
The classification depends on the level of risk posed to residents.
Type A Deficiencies
Definition
A Type A deficiency is issued when a violation presents an immediate or substantial threat to the health, safety, or personal rights of residents.
These are considered serious violations.
Examples of Type A Violations
Unlocked medications accessible to residents
Retention of a resident with a prohibited health condition
Failure to report elder abuse
Lack of fire clearance compliance
Inadequate supervision resulting in injury
Staffing levels insufficient to meet resident needs
Failure to provide emergency care
Type A citations often carry civil penalties.
Civil Penalties for Type A
Penalties may include:
$150 per day per violation
Increased penalty amounts for repeated violations
Immediate correction orders
Potential license probation
Serious cases may lead to:
Temporary suspension order
Exclusion from accepting new residents
Revocation proceedings
Type B Deficiencies
Definition
A Type B deficiency is issued when a violation does not present immediate danger but still represents non-compliance with Title 22.
These are regulatory violations requiring correction.
Examples of Type B Violations
Missing staff training documentation
Incomplete MAR entries
Missing physician reports
Failure to post required notices
Minor documentation errors
Expired first aid certification
Although less severe than Type A, repeated Type B citations may escalate enforcement scrutiny.
Deficiency Documentation: LIC 809 Form
After the survey, CDSS issues findings on Form LIC 809.
The LIC 809 includes:
Regulatory citation reference
Description of violation
Scope and severity
Correction deadline
Civil penalty (if applicable)
Administrators must review this document carefully before signing.
Signing does not indicate agreement; it confirms receipt.
Correction of Deficiencies
Plan of Correction (POC)
Facilities must submit a written Plan of Correction (POC) by the deadline specified.
A compliant POC should include:
Immediate corrective action taken
Systemic change implemented
Monitoring process to prevent recurrence
Person responsible for oversight
Completion date
Generic or vague POCs often trigger rejection.
Timelines
Type A deficiencies often require immediate correction or very short timelines.
Type B deficiencies usually allow up to 10 calendar days unless otherwise specified.
Failure to correct within the timeframe may result in additional penalties.
Handling Type A Deficiencies Strategically
When a Type A citation is issued:
1. Correct Immediately
Take corrective action before the surveyor leaves if possible.
2. Document Thoroughly
Maintain:
Incident reports
Staff retraining documentation
Updated policies
Photographic evidence (if applicable)
3. Conduct Root Cause Analysis
Determine whether violation was:
Isolated human error
System failure
Policy gap
Staffing deficiency
CDSS expects systemic correction, not superficial fixes.
4. Implement Monitoring System
Establish:
Monthly audits
Supervisor review checklists
Training refreshers
Demonstrating ongoing oversight strengthens compliance posture.
Handling Type B Deficiencies Strategically
Type B deficiencies should not be minimized. They signal operational weaknesses.
Recommended steps:
Correct documentation gaps immediately
Update policies if outdated
Re-educate staff
Conduct internal audit to identify similar issues
Multiple Type B citations across surveys may indicate patterns of non-compliance.
Public Posting Requirements
Type A citations must often be:
Posted in a visible area
Made available to residents and families
Deficiencies may also appear on public licensing reports.
Transparency impacts facility reputation.
Appeal Process
Facilities may appeal citations if they believe findings are inaccurate.
The appeal process generally involves:
Written dispute submission
Supporting documentation
Possible administrative review
Appeals must be timely and fact-based.
Strategic review by regulatory consultants or legal counsel is recommended before initiating an appeal.
Repeat Violations and Escalation
Repeated deficiencies may result in:
Increased civil penalties
Compliance conference
Conditional license
Mandatory compliance plan
Revocation proceedings
CDSS tracks violation history.
Facilities with recurring issues face greater enforcement intensity.
Best Practices to Prepare for CDSS Surveys
1. Conduct Quarterly Internal Mock Surveys
Audit:
Resident files
Medication logs
Staff credentials
Emergency drills
2. Maintain Survey Binder
Include:
Administrator certificate
Staff roster
Training logs
Disaster plan
Incident log
Infection control plan
3. Train Staff on Survey Protocol
Staff should:
Answer truthfully
Provide documents promptly
Avoid speculation
4. Review Prior LIC 809 Reports
Analyze patterns and prevent recurrence.
Risk Management Considerations
CDSS survey findings can affect:
Insurance underwriting
Investor due diligence
Change of ownership approvals
Public perception
Referral relationships
Facilities with strong compliance histories are more attractive for acquisition and partnerships.
Conclusion
The CDSS survey process for California RCFEs is structured, documentation-driven, and risk-focused. Understanding the distinction between Type A and Type B deficiencies is essential for protecting licensure and maintaining operational stability.
Type A deficiencies represent immediate threats and carry serious enforcement consequences. Type B deficiencies reflect regulatory non-compliance but still require prompt and systemic correction.
Proactive compliance systems, internal audits, and structured plans of correction significantly reduce exposure to penalties and licensing instability.
Effective RCFE administrators treat surveys as ongoing readiness exercises, not isolated events.
URL References:
California Department of Social Services – Community Care Licensing
https://www.cdss.ca.gov/inforesources/community-care-licensing
RCFE Regulations – Title 22
https://www.cdss.ca.gov/Portals/9/Regs/rcfe_regs.pdf
California Health and Safety Code – RCFE
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
California Long-Term Care Ombudsman
https://aging.ca.gov/programs-and-services/long-term-care-ombudsman
© 2025 SummitRidge. All rights reserved.


